What ethical obligations do we have towards animals, if any, and why? What ought we conclude about factory farming and/or the use of animals in medical researches?
Terror builds upon "error", when people "err" in mis-believing "or" that precludes "neither" as a possible outcome.
When everyone presumes: "my nose must be the biggest", win-win is out of the question, leaving behind the only option of "either/or" and henceforth people shout: "no pain, no gain".
The selfish talk to the selfish: "My pain for my gain? No way." "Your gain on my pain? F-ck U." "My gain on your pain, why not?"
That starts a never ending vicious cycle (war and fighting again and again) in men-men relationships.
Animals in men-animals realtionships, are helpless, of course, in the hands of the vicious human beings, being always in pain without gain.
But when people live evil, whose pain and whose gain??
Terror builds upon an "error", that "or" does entail "neither" when terror exists.
Men live no more except evil! Men's destiny is extinction.
人類的貪婪做成嚴重的惡果！
回覆刪除Terror builds upon "error", when people "err" in mis-believing "or" that precludes "neither" as a possible outcome.
回覆刪除When everyone presumes: "my nose must be the biggest", win-win is out of the question, leaving behind the only option of "either/or" and henceforth people shout: "no pain, no gain".
The selfish talk to the selfish:
"My pain for my gain? No way."
"Your gain on my pain? F-ck U."
"My gain on your pain, why not?"
That starts a never ending vicious cycle (war and fighting again and again) in men-men relationships.
Animals in men-animals realtionships, are helpless, of course, in the hands of the vicious human beings, being always in pain without gain.
But when people live evil, whose pain and whose gain??
Terror builds upon an "error", that "or" does entail "neither" when terror exists.
Men live no more except evil! Men's destiny is extinction.
作者已經移除這則留言。
回覆刪除在這個追求最大利益化的社會裡，如果再不改變，相信可見的將來不只是農場裡的動物，連社會裡人類動物的生活也會越來越辛苦...
回覆刪除我認為人類為了自己能賺取更多錢, 而不理會有否對自然做成災害, 做出很多有理性的人都接受不了的事. 如這樣對待"生命"是不對的.
回覆刪除但我們又可以怎麼做呢? 如昨天的堂上看過, 一美元可以買一個漢堡飽, 但不可以買到一斤新鮮蔬菜. 這會否很奇怪呢?
從陰謀論來說, 我們這樣對待動物, 動物會使用相同的方法對待我們, 如病菌. 這亦是值得我們思考的
對於很多課堂上的問題,都有其正反兩面的衝突,因為當中都會對生命有不同道德價值的判斷,大家出發的角度及思考方向不一,就會有正反不同意見,但我認為,唯獨這些動物工廠就是沒有討論價值,就是為了擴大自己的財富,而去殘虐動物,這裡的動物已被賤視為一種工具,他們屠殺,虐待,也不覺得有任何問題,因為他們已不把生命體視為生命,對生命漠視就是不道德。我認為這種行為除了遣責外是沒有第二種立場的。
回覆刪除